This scorching hot intel comes LewRockwell.com, which the Wikipedia tells me is
a widely read 501(c)(4) libertarian web magazine operated by Burton Blumert (publisher, died on March 30, 2009), Lew Rockwell (editor-in-chief), Eric Garris (webmaster), and others associated with the Center for Libertarian Studies (CLS); its motto is "anti-state, anti-war, pro-market".
It is associated with the oh so prestigious Ludwig Von Mises Institute and its proprietors are apparently big fans of both Austrian school economics and Ron Paul.
Our intrepid author is Michael Gaddy, whose most recent article was entitled "Battle Rifle Basics." Gaddy is also a veteran of our heroic struggle against the dark forces of Grenada, so he is clearly an expert on the most pressing national security problems facing our republic.
Members of all branches of the United States Military will soon be facing a most critical decision. A report emerged that Obama is using the deployment of additional troops to Afghanistan to cover for the movement of some 200,000 troops, presently on duty in countries other than Iraq and Afghanistan, to USNORTHCOM to prepare for the "expected outbreak of Civil War within the United States before the end of winter."
TO THE RAMPARTS (and please disregard the fact that no source or quote is actually given and the sack-of-cats-crazy notion that moving troops into Afghanistan would somehow conceal the movement of 200K troops stateside)!!1!1!!
It would appear those who call themselves "public servants" believe the people they supposedly serve have become dissatisfied with their job performance and will resort to some form of civil disobedience, which will necessitate military intervention. According to the article, Obama believes the reason for this civil unrest to be an expected "implosion" of this country’s financial systems. Should these events occur, members of the military would be forced to decide whether they would support their government, which gave hundreds of billions to government cronies in the financial sector, or their country.
Oh man, THE ARTICLE says that?!?!? Oh crap oh crap oh crap oh crap...(Waitaminute now...where did that article come from again? Flip over to the SPLC and find out that the article came from the European Union Times, a publication on par with LewRockwell.com in terms of its impeccable journalistic standards. And by standards we mainly mean linking to white supremacist sites.)
A prudent man would speculate if the government so fears coming civil unrest, will they move to seize firearms throughout the country and use these military forces along with law enforcement to do so?
Frankly, it would be irresponsible not to speculate. A prudent man would further speculate as to whether the gubmint also has a secret plan to seize all of the nation's gummy bears and form them into a Giant Gummy Bear of Tyranny that would be used to replace the Statue of Liberty.
Both political parties have conducted this demonization of true Patriots.
Preach on! WE R THE TRU PATRIOTZ!!!11!
While the democrats have been traditionally anti-gun and liberty...
Yeah! Capitalization of proper nouns is a fascist plot!
...the republicans bought into the program with the fascist Patriot Act and the illegal, unconstitutional War on Terror.
Wait, what's with all the hippy-speak all of a sudden? You're losin' me bro...
The two dominant political parties in this country are two wings of the same vulture: blatant in-your-face socialism.
Wait, but...I'm just confused now.
Many on the right have bought into the ideas expressed by leaders of the military that all who oppose the state and its illegal agenda should be treated no differently than the "insurgents" the military has been facing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nowhere is that better illustrated than here where a law enforcement publication is advocating military tactics promoted by General David Petraeus be used against those whom the state defines as its enemies.
TYRANNY!!!11! (The linked article suggests that police officers engage in such tyrannical COIN-inspired practices as knowing your environment and collecting solid intelligence.)
While the article in Guns and Weapons for Law Enforcement speaks specifically of gangs and drug activity, don’t forget the Department of Homeland Security has defined millions of patriotic Americans and veterans as possible domestic terrorists in its report sent to LE agencies on April 7th of 2009.
Oh yeah, that crazy, crazy, CRAZY DHS report!
If you wonder if you fit the definition of possible domestic terrorist, you should check here.
(Here our ever-vigilant reporter links to a report by the Missouri Highway Patrol.)
If the report is correct and Obama is moving to strengthen USNORTHCOM with anywhere near the numbers mentioned, indicates the fedgov fears its own citizens much more than it fears al Qaeda. Either the government is anticipating a total financial breakdown, there are plans to confiscate firearms, a new false flag event is in the works, or any combination of the three. Either way, they plan on this event occurring before spring of 2010.
Well, clearly it would have to be one of those three things or some combination thereof.
On the minds of many Americans and politicians is exactly how will the military and law enforcement react if told to confiscate firearms or move American citizens to FEMA camps.
Wait a second, I think I heard about them camps somewhere else...
If military and law enforcement personnel begin to side with the citizens, will the fedgov call in United Nations forces to subdue those who cherish personal freedom and will fight to retain it?
I think that would be the most logical conclusion, absolutely.
Regardless of which series of events occur, Americans will be the losers. Brace yourselves and prepare, this is going to get real ugly.
(Oh yeah, about that European Union Times article that mentions the Obama-Sending-in-the-Troops-to-Take-Your-Guns-Etc. report...what was their source on that again? Oh, Russian military analysts. The guys who brought us this. What else can I add except for maybe some dancing leprechauns?)