22 May 2010

Kim might be responsible?

There are unconfirmed reports that US intelligence believes Kim Jong-il is responsible for the attack on the Cheonan. It says that it is based on the internal dynamics of the state, rather than hard evidence, but they believe that the sinking was intended to help shore up the succession of Kim's son.

I don't buy the logic, but I'll admit to not having access to the same classified material. The idea is that standing up to the West will reestablish the strength of the Kim image, and help the son take power. Moreover, there is some evidence that Kim Jong-il congratulated the

If so, it might well make the Kims the dumbest dynasty on Earth. Would it be worth it to risk war with the greatest naval powers in the world, to insure that your son takes the throne?

27 comments:

  1. 好文章就值得回響,如果可以常常看到您的更新,應該是件很幸福的事情~~ ........................................

    ReplyDelete
  2. 來給你加加油~打打氣!!!更新之餘,也要注意休息哦~~........................................

    ReplyDelete
  3. 要在憂患恥辱的環境裡,創造我們自力更生的新生活。..................................................

    ReplyDelete
  4. 過去的事早已消失,未來的事更渺不可知,只有現在是真實的................................................

    ReplyDelete
  5. 知識可以傳授,智慧卻不行。每個人必須成為他自己。............................................................

    ReplyDelete